Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background and Aims:
To assess the user perceptions on efficiency and effectiveness of Tele-clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods:
An audit collected feedback based on questionnaires from surgeons, patients and nurses, conducting/attending tele-clinics after 4 weeks of their initiation in the first surge of COVID-19 in the UK.
Results:
In this audit, 15 clinicians and 12 patients were opportunistically interviewed. 46% of the clinicians and 83% of the patients agreed that telephonic consultation was convenient, flexible and time-efficient. Two-thirds of clinicians felt that it required less staffing and therefore was cost-effective. Majority of patients (80%) agreed that tele-clinics were efficient, were associated with less stress/ anxiety. Most (86%) surgeons agreed that tele-clinics were limited by the lack of access to a detailed physical examination. Almost half the responses from clinicians, were positive regarding the effectiveness in reaching a diagnosis/ planning management, with a recognition of the potential risk for under or over-investigation. Most (91.6%) patients were satisfied with the way their clinical consultation was addressed. Some patients would still prefer to meet their doctor face-to-face to discuss a final management plan.
Conclusions:
Our audit provides evidence that Tele-clinics offered an efficient, potentially environmental conscious, cost-effective alternative to physical outpatient clinics, both to clinicians and patients, with recognised limitations.
References
World Health Organisations, 2009. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in Member States: report on the second global survey on eHealth 2009. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO press.
Car J, Sheikh A. Telephone consultations. BMJ 2003;326: 966-969.
Thompson-Coon J, Abdul-Rehman A, Whear R et al. Telephone consultations in place of face to face out-patient consultations for patients discharged from hospital following surgery: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research 2013;13:128.
Newbould J, Abel G, Ball S et al. Evaluation of telephone first approach to demand management in English general practice: an observational study. BMJ 2017;358:j4197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4197.
Bertram D. Likert Scales. 2016. Retrieved June 08, 2020 from: http://my.ilstu.edu/~eostewa/497/Likert%20topic-dane-likert.pdf.
Jones D T, Yoon M J, Licameli G. Effectiveness of Postoperative follow-up telephone interviews for patients who underwent Adenotonsillectomy – A retrospective study. Arch Otolaryngolog Head Neck Surg 2007;133(11):1091-1095.
Sutiono A B, Faried A, McAllister S et al. The Bandung neurosurgery patient outcomes project, Indonesia (Part II): Patient pathways and feasibility and acceptability of telephone follow-up. Int J Health Plann Mgmt 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2408 [Accessed 20 May 2020]
Mathew AS, Agarwal JP, Munshi A et al. A prospective study of telephonic contact and subsequent physical follow-up of radically treated lung cancer patients. Indian J Cancer 2017;54:241-252. http://www.indianjcancer.com/text.asp?2017/54/1/241/219599 [Accessed 22 May 2020]
Ireland S, Kent B. Telephone pre-operative assessment for adults: a comprehensive systematic review. JBI Libr Syst Rev 2012;10(25):1452‐1503.
Casey RG, Powell L, Braithwaite M et al. Nurse-Led Phone Call Follow-Up Clinics Are Effective for Patients With Prostate Cancer. J Patient Exp 2017;4(3):114‐120.
Royal College of General Practitioners, 2020. Principles of safe video consulting in general practice during COVID-19. London: National Health Service. https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/publication/preparedness-letters-for-general-practice/ [Accessed 07 June 2020].
Hewitt H, Gafaranga J, McKinstry B. Comparison of face-to-face and telephone consultations in primary care: qualitative analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2010;DOI:10.3399/bjgp10X501831.
Augestad KM, Lindsetmo RO. Overcoming distance: video-conferencing as a clinical and educational tool among surgeons. World J Surg 2009;33(7):1356‐1365.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2020 Array